<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for GBlog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gblog.gnote.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gblog.gnote.ca</link>
	<description>The Official GNote.ca Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:44:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doctor Who (2005 to present) / Torchwood / Sarah Jane Adventures Series Viewing Order by Gus Webb</title>
		<link>http://gblog.gnote.ca/2011/01/doctor-who-2005-to-present-torchwood-sarah-jane-adventures-series-viewing-order/comment-page-1/#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gblog.gnote.ca/?p=120#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>Glad it helps! I&#039;m looking forward to adding in the next Christmas special in a month or so :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad it helps! I&#8217;m looking forward to adding in the next Christmas special in a month or so <img src='http://gblog.gnote.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Doctor Who (2005 to present) / Torchwood / Sarah Jane Adventures Series Viewing Order by perkyshadowgirl</title>
		<link>http://gblog.gnote.ca/2011/01/doctor-who-2005-to-present-torchwood-sarah-jane-adventures-series-viewing-order/comment-page-1/#comment-2457</link>
		<dc:creator>perkyshadowgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gblog.gnote.ca/?p=120#comment-2457</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for this! =D I&#039;m a completionist (love that term!) and I really appreciate that this list is not only current, but includes the Sarah Jane Adventures as well! =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for this! =D I&#8217;m a completionist (love that term!) and I really appreciate that this list is not only current, but includes the Sarah Jane Adventures as well! =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Videos by New Page &#171; GBlog</title>
		<link>http://gblog.gnote.ca/online-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>New Page &#171; GBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greviews.gnote.ca/online-videos/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>[...] added a new online videos page with links to some of my favourite videos. This trend of free online video watching has been on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] added a new online videos page with links to some of my favourite videos. This trend of free online video watching has been on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix by gus.webb</title>
		<link>http://gblog.gnote.ca/2007/07/harry-potter-and-the-order-of-the-phoenix/comment-page-1/#comment-1572</link>
		<dc:creator>gus.webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greviews.gnote.ca/2007/07/11/harry-potter-and-the-order-of-the-phoenix/#comment-1572</guid>
		<description>Yes, I know the movie is named after the Order, and the Order was barely in the movie.

I hope someone adapts these books to screen properly someday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I know the movie is named after the Order, and the Order was barely in the movie.</p>
<p>I hope someone adapts these books to screen properly someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix by ws</title>
		<link>http://gblog.gnote.ca/2007/07/harry-potter-and-the-order-of-the-phoenix/comment-page-1/#comment-1571</link>
		<dc:creator>ws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greviews.gnote.ca/2007/07/11/harry-potter-and-the-order-of-the-phoenix/#comment-1571</guid>
		<description>The movie is named after the secret society of the same name, not the mythical bird of the same name.

I&#039;ve been saying for years: &quot;You can&#039;t compress a 500+ page book into a two hour movie&quot;, and this is more proof for the pile.

It&#039;s not the cliff&#039;s notes version, just the Readers&#039; Digest Condensed Edition. In many ways, that&#039;s far worse.

We went to see it in IMAX. The only reason I&#039;m not saying it was a complete waste to do so is that we were late getting to a packed theatre and ended up sitting near the front. It&#039;s there that a 20m high screen has its advantages. But the 3D scenes were blurry and ghosted.

I spent at least half the movie wondering if Harry was going to go third-rate emo on someone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie is named after the secret society of the same name, not the mythical bird of the same name.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been saying for years: &#8220;You can&#8217;t compress a 500+ page book into a two hour movie&#8221;, and this is more proof for the pile.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the cliff&#8217;s notes version, just the Readers&#8217; Digest Condensed Edition. In many ways, that&#8217;s far worse.</p>
<p>We went to see it in IMAX. The only reason I&#8217;m not saying it was a complete waste to do so is that we were late getting to a packed theatre and ended up sitting near the front. It&#8217;s there that a 20m high screen has its advantages. But the 3D scenes were blurry and ghosted.</p>
<p>I spent at least half the movie wondering if Harry was going to go third-rate emo on someone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Videos by New Page &#187; G-reviewS</title>
		<link>http://gblog.gnote.ca/online-videos/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>New Page &#187; G-reviewS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 07:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greviews.gnote.ca/online-videos/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve added a new online videos page with links to some of my favourite videos. This trend of free online video watching has been on the rise lately. Will it keep picking up steam? Only time will tell.     &#160;   &#171; Snakes on a Plane !!! &#124;   &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve added a new online videos page with links to some of my favourite videos. This trend of free online video watching has been on the rise lately. Will it keep picking up steam? Only time will tell.     &nbsp;   &laquo; Snakes on a Plane !!! |   &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From Justin to Kelly by Dave</title>
		<link>http://gblog.gnote.ca/2006/06/from-justin-to-kelly/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 06:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greviews.gnote.ca/2006/06/11/from-justin-to-kelly/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think that even watching this movie in an ampitheatre full of people would make it enjoyable.  Maybe if I got some really good E, smoked up several bowls of potent chronic, took 7 or 8 hits of opium, shot up with some heroin, ate a salad of bad shrooms, dropped PCP laced acid, and took two or three puffs on an asthma inhaler I would enjoy it.  Still, I doubt I could ever enjoy a movie like that.  Given the choice between this and telepoll, I would flip a coin, pop some Quaaludes and pray that when I finally snapped back to reality my hellish nightmare would be over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that even watching this movie in an ampitheatre full of people would make it enjoyable.  Maybe if I got some really good E, smoked up several bowls of potent chronic, took 7 or 8 hits of opium, shot up with some heroin, ate a salad of bad shrooms, dropped PCP laced acid, and took two or three puffs on an asthma inhaler I would enjoy it.  Still, I doubt I could ever enjoy a movie like that.  Given the choice between this and telepoll, I would flip a coin, pop some Quaaludes and pray that when I finally snapped back to reality my hellish nightmare would be over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Mac Ads by ws</title>
		<link>http://gblog.gnote.ca/2006/06/new-mac-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>ws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greviews.gnote.ca/2006/06/15/new-mac-ads/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Note I referred to x86-based linux. Not pre-packaged distros compiled for powerpc, but the x86 architecture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note I referred to x86-based linux. Not pre-packaged distros compiled for powerpc, but the x86 architecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Mac Ads by Dave</title>
		<link>http://gblog.gnote.ca/2006/06/new-mac-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 20:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greviews.gnote.ca/2006/06/15/new-mac-ads/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Linux is not better!  It&#039;s more stable, more customizable, more useful, but not better.  Okay, so yeah, it&#039;s better.  It&#039;s much better.

Anyhow, they&#039;ve had linux working on Macs for years, WS.  One of the better suited distros for that is Yellow Dog, which is entirely designed for running on Mac hardware.  As for finding the terminal, it&#039;s really easy!  All you have to do is go to your docker; click the finder icon; go to the top bar (which now says &quot;Finder&quot;) and click &quot;go&quot;; go to applications and scroll down to realize you went to the wrong folder; repeat process until you clicked &quot;applications&quot; and click &quot;utilities&quot; this time; double-click on &quot;terminal&quot; in the utilities.  It&#039;s just that easy!

Personally, if I were to own a Mac, I would either put Yellow Dog, Debian, or Gentoo on it and have MacOSX as a dual-boot partition.  I would change MacOSX to get rid of all its &quot;easy functionality crap&quot; and make a key binding to open the terminal.  Darwin would also have ports of xorg installed so that I could run my x11 apps.  Then, would come the KDE and Gnome libraries.  Eventually, you would get a proper functioning xnix box with OSX as the desktop environment.  Yellow Dog/Debian/Gentoo would just be the shortcut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux is not better!  It&#8217;s more stable, more customizable, more useful, but not better.  Okay, so yeah, it&#8217;s better.  It&#8217;s much better.</p>
<p>Anyhow, they&#8217;ve had linux working on Macs for years, WS.  One of the better suited distros for that is Yellow Dog, which is entirely designed for running on Mac hardware.  As for finding the terminal, it&#8217;s really easy!  All you have to do is go to your docker; click the finder icon; go to the top bar (which now says &#8220;Finder&#8221;) and click &#8220;go&#8221;; go to applications and scroll down to realize you went to the wrong folder; repeat process until you clicked &#8220;applications&#8221; and click &#8220;utilities&#8221; this time; double-click on &#8220;terminal&#8221; in the utilities.  It&#8217;s just that easy!</p>
<p>Personally, if I were to own a Mac, I would either put Yellow Dog, Debian, or Gentoo on it and have MacOSX as a dual-boot partition.  I would change MacOSX to get rid of all its &#8220;easy functionality crap&#8221; and make a key binding to open the terminal.  Darwin would also have ports of xorg installed so that I could run my x11 apps.  Then, would come the KDE and Gnome libraries.  Eventually, you would get a proper functioning xnix box with OSX as the desktop environment.  Yellow Dog/Debian/Gentoo would just be the shortcut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Mac Ads by ws</title>
		<link>http://gblog.gnote.ca/2006/06/new-mac-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>ws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 16:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greviews.gnote.ca/2006/06/15/new-mac-ads/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Am I the only person who can&#039;t get anything done on a mac? All the fancy widgets they&#039;ve got on the desktop serve to prevent people from actually doing work. Accidentally move your mouse to a corner of the screen and *woosh* another selector opens, covering over what you were trying to do. And opening a terminal window is harder than finding a fitness freak in a McDonalds...

At least now with the new breed of mac, I can put x86 linux in an expensive box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only person who can&#8217;t get anything done on a mac? All the fancy widgets they&#8217;ve got on the desktop serve to prevent people from actually doing work. Accidentally move your mouse to a corner of the screen and *woosh* another selector opens, covering over what you were trying to do. And opening a terminal window is harder than finding a fitness freak in a McDonalds&#8230;</p>
<p>At least now with the new breed of mac, I can put x86 linux in an expensive box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

